Overall,
I enjoyed the novel Locomotion.
I admit it was good but not one of my favorites since I am not a huge
of fan of poetry, especially poem novels. However, I understand how
the story needed to be told through poetry. I appreciated the insight
into the main character's mind.
However,
I do have one big issue with this novel. It can be hard to grasp
because it is not your typical novel. It can be hard to find the plot
in this book because it seems to be made up of snippets. Honestly, I
don't think this is the novel most teens would pick off of a shelf. I
might do it as a class read aloud to expose kids to poetry. I think
it is good for that: making poetry relatable to teens today. Kids can
easily see poetry as a way for expressing their own feelings by
reading this book.
One
thing I did like about this book was how the main character questions
religion. I think that during the adolescent years, people start
questioning their parents' beliefs and deciding what they believe in.
That is clearly done in this novel, which I think is something teens
will easily relate to.
There
is also the issue of Black and White and how the main character kind
of resents his White teacher for not understanding what it is like to
be Black. I think that is a huge issue that our increasingly diverse
students experience today. Heck, I know I kind of went through that
and probably still do. And it's not just about race. It is about
socioeconomic status as a whole.
I
think this book deals with a lot of important social issues, although
it is not necessarily action-packed.
Moving
on to the articles.
I
found the Ben excerpt
interesting but hard to relate to my book. Is it supposed to offer a
different perspective? I'm not sure since it is not does not even
take place in the same time period. I just got that this man was
marrying this young woman and he would end up running a plantation.
Even though he is against slavery. And so is she.
I
thought the Paterson article was really interesting in terms of
Locomotion. I think it
is important to talk about how books can potentially offend some
readers. However, like he argues, what matters is that he is not
doing it to injure readers. He is simply portraying reality as he
sees is. As someone who likes to write fiction as well, I can relate
to that.
The
other article, which is also by the Locomotion
author, was also really thought-provoking. I can definitely see her
point. Why write about something if you haven't been in that person's
shoes? You can't write about being Black if you're not Black. That's
true.
For
the most part, I think.
I
think that most people who write about experiences outside of their
own probably fail. It takes a very good writer to write about someone
who is nothing like him or her. It's hard not to do it without
getting something wrong or portraying a prejudice.
However,
I do think that it should be done.
Why?
Well,
I recently read a novel about being sold into prostitution. Was that
author a prostitute? Was she from Nepal as was the main character? No
and no. But I think she did justice to this story that needed to be
sold. However, she spent a long time traveling to Nepal and talking
to those girls. I think that gave the story the authenticity it
needed. It was a good example of how some writers can write a story
that is not their own.
Lester,
J. (1971). Ben. In J. Lester, The long journey home: Stories From
Black History (pp.60-88). New York: Dial.
Paterson,
K. “Cultural politics from a writer’s point of view.” The
New Advocate.
Woodson,
J. (2003). Locomotion. New York: Puffin Books.
Woodson,
J. (2003). “Who can tell my story?”. Stories matter: The
complexity of cultural authenticity in children’s literature.
Urbana Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
No comments:
Post a Comment